Bottom-Up vs Top-Down Budgeting Approaches

Before deciding which is the best budgeting approach for you, weighing the pros and cons is important. This allows departments to participate in new projects and strategic initiatives, giving them buy-in on the finalized budget. This budgeting process requires the managers of each department to give their input since they are in the best place to know all of the various needs and costs. Version control issues, formula errors, and slow updates make it hard to consolidate inputs from multiple teams.

• Teams don’t have a say, so budgets end up disconnected from actual needs.
• Units are given spending limits and are expected to plan their activities around these guidelines.
• They then examine expenses incurred and the return-on-investment for various initiatives.
• Ultimately, this helps create the best environment for successful bottom-up budgeting.
• Teams have to justify every single expense from the ground up, regardless of the previous year’s budget.

Choosing the right approach for your team

• On the other hand, bottom-up budgeting promotes a two-way communication channel.
• Each department formulates budgets based on their projected requirements for the upcoming year, encompassing planned initiatives, ongoing programs, and staffing needs.
• Finance reviews the proposed company budget with the management, executive or leadership team, to get final approval.
• It is administratively challenging to collect, review and consolidate the multiple submissions from the different departments.
• With fewer meetings and discussions, the budget formulation process moves swiftly.

The reason for this is that in the smaller companies, the leadership maintains Retained Earnings on Balance Sheet close operational oversight. This means that there is a diminished information gap between executives and departments. The top-down method is favoured in changing markets because centralised budgeting can provide faster responses.

Ready to optimize your workforce planning and compensation strategy?

• Bottom-up budgeting takes a more collaborative, data-driven approach involving input from various departments.
• This will need to include recurring expenses such as salaries, office supplies, postage and printing costs, dues and subscriptions, and travel.
• Additionally, incorporating feedback from all levels of the organization can lead to improvements in the budgeting process and better alignment with the organization’s needs.
• Each department within the organization is then required to submit their budgets to the finance department for harmonization.
• This communication helps departments understand their roles and responsibilities within the larger organizational framework.

This way, you’ll take into account how your top-down vs bottom-up budgeting business may evolve over time and what’s required now. Whether you want to implement a top-down or bottom-up budgeting process, knowing the benefits and drawbacks of both is key. Overall, all budget decisions go through multiple layers of management before being shared with the larger teams. Let’s not forget the coordination role of the CFO and their financial team.

How to centralize your company’s budgeting process with TeamOhana

• The departmental managers then utilize the budgets for the operational purposes and they assign such budgets to the operational staff.
• As with any type of top-down management style, though, aligning your departmental teams behind the results may be more difficult.
• Departments manage their own budgets, which requires careful coordination to ensure alignment with overall company goals.
• The choice of top down and bottom up budgeting approaches impacts the level of involvement and decision-making power at different management levels.
• In a bottom-up approach, the budgeting process starts with individual departments submitting their budget proposals based on their needs, which are then reviewed and approved by upper management.
• It takes longer, and without clear guidelines, teams might inflate budgets or set goals that don’t match the company’s strategy.

Requests for additional funds or significant adjustments typically require approval from senior leadership. This guarantees trial balance that all financial decisions are aligned with the company’s strategy and overall priorities. Bottom-up planning preserves insights gained over time, making it easier to refine estimates while accounting for known factors. Meanwhile, zero-based budgeting emphasizes accountability and cost control by challenging teams to justify every expense.

Step 1: Assess Organizational Goals

This systematic approach to budgeting reflects the strategic objectives of the company, aligning departmental goals with the overall corporate vision. Top down budgeting ensures that financial resources are directly allocated to support the company’s strategic goals. Senior management sets priorities that guide departments, aligning the overall budget with long-term objectives and high-level corporate strategy. Bottom-up budget allocation works particularly well for organizations where individual departments have unique operational requirements and specialized knowledge. This approach suits companies where lower management possesses essential insights into operational needs and cost analysis.

Get an Overview of the Budget With Real-Time Dashboards

However, this efficiency may come at the cost of accuracy and employee buy-in, as departments may feel disconnected from the budgeting process. In contrast, bottom-up budgeting may take longer to complete, as it involves more input and collaboration from employees at all levels of the organization. While top-down budgeting is generally less flexible due to its rigid structure, both methods can adapt over time as organizational needs change. Bottom-up budgeting tends to be more responsive to real-time feedback from departments, allowing for adjustments based on current conditions. However, both approaches can incorporate changes based on evolving circumstances or market conditions. This adaptability ensures that the budgeting process remains relevant and effective, even as the organization and its environment change.

Leadership and department leads set goals & create an effective org design

Top-down budgeting is generally quicker, taking a few weeks to a couple of months to complete. In contrast, bottom-up budgeting takes longer, ranging from two to six months or more. While top-down budgeting may save time upfront, investing time in a bottom-up approach can lead to more accurate and comprehensive budgets. Flexibility in budgeting allows organizations to adapt to changes, reflecting circumstances and moods. On the other hand, top-down budgeting is often rigid because it is determined from the top.